Market & Sourcing

IT Outsourcing: Five Mistakes in Contract Negotiations

by Jeremy Smith

Outsourcing IT services can unlock efficiency, reduce operational burden, and bring specialist expertise into your organisation. But too often, the real cost of a sourcing agreement only becomes clear after the ink under the sourcing contract has dried.

 

At Metrics, we’ve spent over two decades advising enterprise IT leaders through the full sourcing lifecycle. And while technology evolves rapidly, the same pitfalls still appear time and again at the negotiation stage.

Here are five common mistakes to avoid when negotiating IT outsourcing contracts - and what you can do instead to safeguard long-term value.

1. Negotiating Without Business Alignment

The number one issue we see? A sourcing contract that doesn’t clearly map back to business or IT strategy.

If the deal can’t be linked directly to business outcomes or technology goals, it probably shouldn’t happen.

Better approach: At Metrics, we use a 3-tiered alignment check:

  • Business Strategy → What are we trying to achieve?
  • IT Strategy → How does technology support that goal?
  • Sourcing Activity → Does the deal serve both?

This simple test helps CIOs and sourcing teams make sure every contract adds measurable value - not just technical capability.

2. Missing a Tiered Pricing Strategy

Many IT outsourcing deals are negotiated with rigid pricing models. But volumes fluctuate. Technology needs change. And inflexible pricing structures punish the buyer, not the provider.

We’ve seen service providers penalise clients with significant price hikes for reducing volumes, while offering limited savings when volumes increase.

Better approach: Consider a tiered pricing model based on capacity units. This provides more flexibility and helps avoid being locked into a pricing structure that becomes uncompetitive over time.

When Metrics benchmarks IT contracts, we don’t just look at the overall price. We assess individual resource units to make sure each component of the deal stays competitive - even years down the line.

3. Failing to Plan the Exit

It’s easy to focus on the start of a new sourcing relationship. But what happens when you want to leave?

Many organisations underestimate how difficult and expensive it is to exit a contract. Vendor lock-in, restrictive licensing, and data extraction costs can lead to years of unnecessary overspend.

One client of ours had to physically ship hard drives between data centres because cloud download speeds couldn’t handle the volume. That’s how unprepared most exit plans are.

Better approach: Build exit planning into your sourcing strategy from day one. This means you:

  • Understand data portability requirements
  • Negotiate exit clauses that protect your flexibility
  • Benchmark switching costs in advance

As we often say: don’t just price the service. Price the exit.

4. Overlooking Contract Benchmarking

A surprising number of enterprise deals are signed without an independent pricing benchmark. Even when multiple providers submit bids, the solutions are rarely apples-to-apples - making it hard to judge true market value.

This creates risk. In one case, we saw a client agree to a deal that looked competitive at the top level, but relied heavily on a single resource unit (storage) that wasn’t priced competitively. Three years in, that unit had proliferated - and the total cost had ballooned.

Better approach: Benchmark both the aggregate deal and the individual resource units against current market data. At Metrics, we leverage our proprietary Data Lake and 20+ years of experience to identify where you can still negotiate - even at final offer stage.

5. Assuming Cloud Is Always Cheaper

One of the most common myths in IT sourcing today? “Cloud is cheaper.”

Probably not.

If you’re running 24/7 infrastructure, even using reserved cloud instances, chances are you’re paying more than if you kept it on-premises.

Cloud shines for flexible, peaky workloads, development and test… if you switch off capacity when it’s not being used. But for static capacity? It can become a financial black hole, especially as volumes grow.

Better approach: Challenge assumptions before committing to a cloud-first strategy. We help clients model realistic cost scenarios based on:

  • Type of workload (static vs. variable)
  • Exit costs
  • Data egress fees
  • Long-term licensing implications

Cloud should be a strategic choice - not a default.

Answering Your FAQs:

What are the three types of outsourcing contracts?

The most common types include:

  1. Fixed-price contracts: Set fees for defined services.
  2. Time and materials contracts: Payment based on actual time and cost.
  3. Managed service contracts: Ongoing delivery of a service, often with performance SLAs.

What is outsourcing in the IT industry?

IT outsourcing involves using external providers to deliver IT services - from infrastructure to software development - instead of relying solely on in-house teams.

Which IT services should be outsourced?

Ideal candidates for outsourcing include services that are:

  • Non-core but essential (e.g., helpdesk, infrastructure support)
  • Difficult to scale internally
  • Requiring niche expertise

Which type of IT outsourcing is most common?

Managed services are the most widely used model, where a provider handles ongoing IT functions under a service-level agreement (SLA).

Final Thought

Negotiating IT outsourcing contracts isn’t just about cost containment - it’s about protecting long-term flexibility, reducing risk, and making sure your sourcing choices deliver real business value.

If you’re about to enter a new contract or renegotiate an existing one, Metrics can help you stress-test the terms and benchmark your pricing before you commit.

Because the real cost of a bad contract? You won’t see it until it’s too late.

→ Let’s talk. Book a confidential sourcing review with the Metrics team today.

 

Jeremy Smith

Jeremy Smith

Jeremy is responsible for UK, Benelux & Northern Europe and has been in the IT benchmarking arena for over 25 years. He previously received bench­marking exercises as an end user and delivered benchmarking exercises as a project manager.

LinkedIn